Microfinance Focus, November 30, 2011: Fonkoze Financial Services is Haiti’s largest microfinance institution and a founding partner of the Microinsurance Catastrophe Risk Organization (MiCRO).
Founded in 1995, it is serving more than 55,000 women borrowers most of whom live and work in the countryside of Haiti, and more than 255,000 savers.
Fonkoze offers not just loans but a host of financial products for people who don’t usually have access to such tools. One of those is protection from disasters like floods, hurricanes, and earthquakes.
Fonkoze realized the extent of the need for disaster insurance for its clients after Haiti’s Jan. 12, 2010 earthquake. In response to heavy rains this spring, Fonkoze reimbursed more than $1 million in damages and loan reimbursements for 3,800 borrowers in the first ever payout of its natural disaster insurance for poor Haitian clients.
In conversation with Fonkoze’s CEO, Anne Hastings
Microfinance Focus: Tell us how Fonkoze’s clients were affected post earthquake.
Anne Hastings: Fonkoze operates all across the country. Today we have 47 branches and 58, 000 borrowers. After the earthquake, when we identified all the victims there were about 19, 000 of them. At that time we had about 40, 000 clients. So, close to half of our members were victims.
There are only two things which our clients have. First, they have houses, which are nothing more than shacks. There are no government housing programs in Haiti unlike other developing countries. People are living in houses which if you blew hard, they will fall over. Second, most of our clients sell in the marketplaces in Haiti. They buy their good in one place and take them to long distances to sell. So, they can lose either their merchandise or their home or both.
After the earthquake, anyone who was in the hardest hit area of the earthquake had a tendency of losing their home completely. Those who were in the market place at that time, lost their merchandize. Some had deposited the money to purchase merchandize in the bank but after the earthquake, the supplier no longer existed and there was no way for them to go back and prove that they have deposited their money so they never got anything back from that.
And of course, there were many lives lost. There is hardly anyone in Haiti who didn’t know many people who lost their lives. Fonkoze lost five of its employees and 11 of its buildings.
Microfinance Focus: Tell us more about MiCRO.
Anne Hastings: At the time of the earthquake we didn’t have the insurance and MiCRO was not established. However, we were planning to offer the insurance and hoped that we would have it ready by March 2010 and the earthquake came in January. We used donor funding to pilot test whether we could implement this product that we had in mind. Then we discovered that it did work very well and our clients learnt a lot from that experience.
We began to develop the partnership with Mercy Corp, Swiss Re, DIFID and all of the other stakeholders that are involved in getting MiCRO set up. The first time we were actually able to offer this product was in January 2011.
In May this year we had very heavy rains. Swiss Re who is the reinsurer on this product paid out over one million dollars for that disaster. Now we just had another period of heavy rains and they will be paying out about another quarter of a million dollars this time.
Microfinance Focus: What are some of the challenges of delivering catastrophe microinsurance product?
Anne Hastings: There are a lot of problems in delivering such a product. First is education, to make the client understand what the product is, what it means for them and why they should be interested in it. This is the biggest concern at the outset. The second thing is to convince them that they should pay for it. Not only they should have it but they should be paying for it as well. We had credit life insurance since 2007 but we had never asked our clients to pay for that. We gave that to them without them paying anything in order to teach them about insurance, what insurance could do for them and they did love it. We had really been introducing them to the concept of insurance since 2007 and they learnt through that product what it was.
Then we offered it by using the donor money after the earthquake. When they got their new loans, we asked them to pay retroactively for the insurance that we assumed they had on January 12. We did that to make them understand that they are not going to get this kind of insurance for free. They would have to pay for it. We asked them to pay 2% of their loan value. They had already received the benefit of their insurance. We were not insuring them moving forward, we were only making them understand that they have to pay something for what they got after the earthquake.
When we actually offered the product in January 2011, they began paying 3% of their loan value and we are still subsidizing another 2%.
The bigger problem is when we have to assess who is really a victim and who is not a victim after a disaster. We use a creative way for doing that. We use Grameen style methodology of lending. Our clients are organized into solidarity groups of five and between six-ten groups form a center. Those centers are long term associations of women who have dedicated themselves to bringing their families out of poverty by strengthening their businesses and educating themselves. They elect a person to head each of their solidarity groups and the center as a whole elects a center chief.
On the day after the disaster, it is up to the center chief to go around and make an inventory of all of the clients in that center that have had losses. We have to train the center chiefs to do that. We have 15 facilitators and they go out to the next center meeting with that list and they try to get the center to reach consensus on who should actually receive the payout.
There are always degrees and we want the clients themselves to reach a consensus on who should receive the payout. All we are trying to do is to make them understand that if everyone is trying to get a payout we will never be able to continue with this kind of insurance.
Microfinance Focus: Is MiCRO developing any new products?
Anne Hastings: We made a commitment at the Clinton Global Initiative for a product on cholera. After the earthquake we had a huge problem of cholera epidemic for the first time in its history. We are going to try to use a similar type of insurance to assists those people when their families get sick from cholera and they can’t keep their businesses going
Microfinance Focus: What are some of the other issues in Haiti that Fonkoze is addressing?
Anne Hastings: We have a website called Zafèn. In Creole it means ‘It is our business’. We set up this website in order to profile on the website enterprises in Haiti that are not micro but small and medium in our definition. We encourage the Haitian’s Diaspora and other friends of Haiti to invest in these enterprises. We do the due intelligence on these enterprises and the money from the investors goes directly to the enterprises.
After the first year of its operation, we realized that Haitians living abroad have been asked to do so much to keep Haiti alive since the earthquake that they kept sending money to their families in Haiti and in the process they lost their businesses, they overspent on their credit cards and their homes have gone into defaults.
So we were not getting enough money coming through the Zafèn website. We then decided to set up an investment fund because we realized that there all kinds of international NGOs in Haiti who have budget lines for supporting SMEs or for creating jobs. But they really don’t know Haiti at all. They have been here only since the earthquake. They don’t have any way to assess these enterprises. The idea is that we will get these NGOs to come together to build a fund that we can continually cycle through Zafèn enterprises. It is just a second way to bring investment capital to enterprises in Haiti. Zafèn will still be operational for Haitians and other people living abroad but there will an extra source of investment capital that can be cycled through. Many NGOs are excited about it because of the fact that they don’t know how to spend the money they have in Haiti
Microfinance Focus: Fonkoze is one of the industry leaders in social performance management. How does it benefit Fonkoze?
Anne Hastings: In today’s environment there are many benefits. First of all, you have to start with your mission. There are two types of microfinance institutions. There are those which try to maximize access to everyone. The other type wants to use microfinance as a tool for people making their way out of poverty. If you take the second type, which is what we are, then you need to measure whether you are achieving your goals or not. If you do not know whether you are succeeding in getting people out of poverty, you cannot continue.
Specially in today’s environment where there are so many challenges like claims that microfinance is just over indebting people and making them worse off than they were before, you really need to know whether you are having a positive impact on their lives or not.
We are continuously monitoring information and using it at management levels to make changes in our program. We have three different ways of collecting information. One is using the PPI (Progress out of Poverty Index) and we verify it on our samples of clients coming into the program and every year we go back to the same client and re-measure and see if they are doing better than the year before or if they are doing worse. We are always running focus groups around the country with clients where we actually try to get information from them on what is working well for them and what is not working so well. That is the way we can really get their understanding of what new products we might need or what programs they don’t see as being particularly useful to them.
The third tool that we use is that we do interviews with the clients who exit the program to know what made them join the program in the first place and what made them fall out of the program. The two principal reasons for them to exit the program are unexpected health issues and the fact that their businesses failed. These two things are linked. If they have bad health, their businesses will fail. That also suggests to us that we need to be increasingly involved in strengthening their businesses. You can’t just give poor women a loan and then send her on her way. We need to accompany her and help her decide what business she should be in and how she should be manage it better so that she remains competitive.
So increasingly we are moving towards more involvement in our clients’ businesses, especially those that are just starting out and are among very poorest people
Microfinance Focus: Your view about the Indian microfinance crisis?
Anne Hastings: It can happen to anyone of us and the best protection against it is that you have a strong social performance management function within your organization. I strongly feel that social performance management does two things, it gives you the information that you need to make better decisions and it allows you to have evidence to show the world when they begin to attack you, whether you are helping or hurting.
The second major initiative is the client protection campaign. We all need to get on board with the Smart Campaign. I am a member of that steering committee. We all need to be transparent about what we are charging our clients for everything they are getting from us. We have to respect their privacy. We have to make sure that we have products that are truly tailored to what they need and we are not using a cookie cutter methodology where we have the same product regardless of where our clients are in their struggle out of poverty.
Our campaign is to protect and educate clients, so that clients can come to our defense if and when the politicians begin their attack. Moreover, it is important to always know whether in fact you are helping your clients to better their lives or you are over indebting them. We need to be vigilant towards over-indebtedness because none of us wants to push our clients backwards instead of forward. The worst thing that can happen to them is that they take on more debt than they can manage.
Microfinance Focus: What are some of the new initiatives Fonkoze is working on?
Anne Hastings: Right now we have to make sure that we work with other countries, MFIs and NGOs, who are interested in working with MiCRO. We didn’t do this just for Fonkoze or just for Haiti. We did it for the world, and we believe that we have something really important to share on how it can be helpful.
There is an MFI in the Jamaica that is interested in MiCRO, and we also have interest from some of the big international NGOs like Mercy Corps, which is an investor in MiCRO. We really want to expand MiCRO. We think it is very important for microfinance institutions around the world.